Your friends are fundraising. Don't miss out, opt in.

Neil Patterson

Neil Patterson is crowdfunding

0%
£289,590
raised of £300,000 target by 295 supporters

Iʼm raising £300,000 to Help Fight HMRC's Unfair Litigation!

Online
27 days to go

Don't have time to donate right now?

Story

Property118 is a champion for landlords, offering essential solutions that help them move their property businesses into a company without being hit by large, unnecessary costs. One of the biggest challenges landlords face during this process is dealing with expensive financing. Property118 has created legal strategies that allow landlords to delay these major costs, making the transition much easier and more affordable.

But now, HMRC is unfairly targeting these helpful solutions, accusing Property118 of promoting tax avoidance. Despite these claims, Property118’s strategies follow clear legal rules and are designed to solve real business problems, not avoid taxes.

Property118 is fighting back, using strong legal arguments and case law to show that their solutions are both lawful and necessary. While HMRC’s actions could force landlords into costly financial situations just to restructure their businesses, Property118 is standing up to protect them

We need your support to stand up against HMRC's unjust actions.

BACKGROUND

In February 2024, HMRC issued Scheme Reference Numbers (SRNs) to Property118 and its clients under the Disclosure of Tax Avoidance Schemes (DOTAS) legislation. Industry professionals have likened this to placing a "KICK ME" sign on the backs of these businesses and their owners.

Property118 swiftly appealed HMRC’s decision to the Tax Tribunal on 5th March 2024, arguing that the recommendations made by Property118 did not provide any tax advantages beyond those intended by legislation and HMRC's extra statutory concessions established over 50 years ago. HMRC was copied into the full details of this appeal on the basis that this would give HMRC more time to reconsider its position and to avoid delays due to the Tribunal having a two-month backlog of work.

On 10th May 2024, the Tax Tribunal finally gave HMRC 60 days to make a “Statement of Case” to justify their actions. One would expect HMRC to respond promptly, especially given that Property118 informed them of the appeal shortly after it was submitted. If HMRC truly believed they had good reason for issuing the SRNs, why did they subsequently apply to the Tax Tribunal Judge to delay the presentation of their case?

Worse still, HMRC wanted to split our Appeal into two separate cases (even though the arguments are largely similar) and double the legal costs for our appeal.

By the deadline of 9th July 2024, HMRC would have had almost five months to justify its actions. Instead, their solicitors have used delay and procedural tactics that drain Property118’s resources, preventing us from assisting other landlords and incurring additional legal costs, further depleting our financial reserves to dangerously low levels. The outcome of this is that as of 1st July 2024 the Tax Tribunal Judge issued new directions granting HMRC a further 60 days to submit their Statement of Case.

In summary, HMRC has got its way and managed to ‘kick the can down the road’ yet again. Assuming they don’t manage to delay the justice process even further it will have been well over six months by the time they provide proper justification for their actions. This is badly impacting our ability to trade to remain in business. This is because we (and all other professional advisers) cannot, with a clear conscience, assist any other landlords to incorporate as a result of the uncertainties created by HMRC’s actions.

HOW YOU CAN HELP

We are raising funds to ensure Property118 has the necessary resources to see this legal battle through to the end. Justice can only prevail if we have the funds to continue fighting against HMRC's unfair litigation practices.

Your support will help us to:

- Cover ongoing legal expenses

- Sustain our operations and support services for landlords

- Challenge HMRC's unjust actions and seek a fair outcome

Join us in this critical fight for fairness. Every contribution makes a difference and brings us one step closer to justice.

Thank you for your support.

From Underdog to Champion

We did it once. We can do it again.

The Property118 Action Group made history when we successfully challenged the West Bromwich Mortgage Company, securing millions in overpayments for landlords across the UK. Our victory was a landmark achievement for the property industry.

We’ve encountered both overwhelming gratitude and unexpected criticism. Some have questioned our motives, even those we helped previously. It’s a stark reminder that while we strive to do right by everyone, it’s impossible to please all.

Your support is crucial as we continue to fight for fair treatment and protect the rights of landlords. By donating, you’re not just helping us; you’re investing in a stronger, fairer property industry.

Proof of our success:

BBC

The Times

Daily Mail

The Telegraph

It is time to say ‘enough is enough’ to HMRC.

UPDATE - 11th September 2024

Last week, HMRC Complaints were asked to consider that representations relating to Discovery Assessments were 115 days past the 30-day service standards. We have since been advised that they are experiencing a high volume of work and the complaint will be considered within 16 weeks “unless they cannot” !!!

UPDATE - 6th November 2025

We understand that the Chartered Institute of Taxation met with HMRC yesterday, with transfers of beneficial interest and Extra-Statutory Concession D32 (ESC D32) on their agenda. Although it may be a month or two before the minutes of that meeting are published, this discussion provides useful context for our ongoing case.

In parallel, we have been working closely with counsel over the past several weeks to prepare a robust set of representations, which we submitted to HMRC yesterday. This comprehensive 51-page document, crafted through extensive collaboration, offers a well-supported legal argument and accompanying evidence, presenting our position on why we believe the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) would uphold our case if it progresses to that stage. This submission also fulfils HMRC’s condition for their ‘in-principle’ agreement to a meeting with us.

HMRC responded promptly, advising us that our representations have been circulated among all relevant stakeholders (decision makers), who will need time to review the detailed document. Given the extent of the submission, this request for additional time is entirely reasonable.

In light of this development, counsel has recommended that we pause the FTT process while awaiting HMRC’s response and any potential meeting. This approach aligns with our preference to resolve the matter collaboratively without resorting to a tribunal hearing, which would take significantly longer. Should the dispute proceed, this pause will allow us to refine our evidential approach, focusing on precise, relevant documentation if required. We are mindful that the FTT prefers concise, targeted evidence over exhaustive submissions, and we are keen to respect that preference.

Share this story

Updates

14

  • Neil Patterson1 month ago
    Neil Patterson

    Neil Patterson

    1 month ago

    The Substantial Incorporation Structure (SIS) is not tax avoidance because it is a commercially-driven strategy that allows landlords to incorporate their property business without immediate refinancing. No tax is avoided. SIS transfers beneficial ownership while retaining legal ownership, ensuring that lender security remains unaffected. Under Sections 85-87 and 114 of the Law of Property Act 1925, the lender’s charge remains intact as the legal title stays with the landlord, protecting lender security​.

    Share this update to help us raise more

  • Neil Patterson1 month ago
    Neil Patterson

    Neil Patterson

    1 month ago

    The Capital Account Restructure (CAR) is not tax avoidance because it allows landlords to withdraw previously taxed capital from their business before incorporation to avoid locking that capital into shares. This commercial objective is supported by Simon’s Taxes and HMRC's BIM45700, which confirms the legitimacy of withdrawing capital before incorporation, even if substitute funding is required​​.

    Share this update to help us raise more

  • Neil Patterson3 months ago
    Neil Patterson

    Neil Patterson

    3 months ago

    UPDATE - 11th September 2024 Last week, HMRC Complaints were asked to consider that representations relating to Discovery Assessments were 115 days past the 30-day service standards. We have since been advised that they are experiencing a high volume of work and the complaint will be considered within 16 weeks “unless they cannot” !!!

    Share this update to help us raise more

5 months ago

Neil Patterson started crowdfunding

Leave a message of support

Page last updated on: 11/12/2024 15.21

Supporters

295

  • Vincent Walker

    Vincent Walker

    Nov 12, 2024

    Keep up the good work!This is my fifth donation, I think

    £400.00

  • Chris coulter

    Chris coulter

    Oct 28, 2024

  • Anonymous

    Anonymous

    Oct 18, 2024

    4th and final installment.

  • Mountgold Lettings Ltd

    Mountgold Lettings Ltd

    Oct 12, 2024

    £500.00

  • Landlord

    Landlord

    Oct 12, 2024

    Power to the landlords of property 118 and LT4LWE NEED THE CHANCE OF FAIRNESS FOR ALL

  • Anonymous

    Anonymous

    Oct 12, 2024

    £50.00

  • Tina Coates

    Tina Coates

    Oct 10, 2024

    Keep going. I despise bullies of any kind

    £20.00

Neil Patterson

Become a supporter

Help Neil Patterson raise more

What is crowdfunding?

Crowdfunding is a new type of fundraising where you can raise funds for your own personal cause, even if you're not a registered nonprofit.

The page owner is responsible for the distribution of funds raised.

About the fundraiser
Neil Patterson

Neil Patterson

Online

Managing Director of Property118 Limited

Report this Page