Story
I'm Raising £100,000 for Social Welfare With this money, I hope to turn the two scripts based on the trilogy of Books The Stealing of Emily, into a TV drama. As my local authority is acting with violence against my family.
Thank you so much for taking the time to visit my JustGiving page.
Misapplication: The Case of Emily’s Relocation
It seems that, as you have placed
This unlawful position upon me and my family and thisA judge can be held in contempt, though it's rare due to judicial immunity. If Judge Hollis selectively applies the Children Act, it's more likely addressed through appeals or judicial review rather than contempt charges. However, if his actions severely disrupt court proceedings, contempt might be considered.
This statement addresses the unlawful relocation of my daughter, Emily, 500 miles from her home, violating the Children Act 1989 and the Children (Northern Ireland) Order 1995. Authorities acted negligently, selectively applying legal rights and breaching statutory duties. Fraudulent affidavits further tainted proceedings, rendering orders void. Immediate action is required to review and quash these orders, ensure accountability for fraud, and restore justice for my daughter and family.
You must provide a legal resolution at your earliest convenience, not in 15 years as you neglected.
I am forced to request a proper investigation
By way of publicly announcing Law Misapplication: The Case of Emily’s Relocation Requirement for Prosecution. People requiring conviction: People-requiring-conviction and providing reasons unlawful misapplication: The Case of Emily’s Relocation – misapplication-the-case-of-emilys-relocation/
Where is the government duty of care in this matter, which is without current lawful remedy or redress? It appears unconstitutional for you not to provide this relief when you have sworn on oath. Redress and remedy are guaranteed and integral.
If you want the original report, it's here and can be corroborated by someone I know who worked as a social worker. 'sex up abuse claims to snatch children for adoption' | UK | News | Social-workers-sex-up-abuse-claims-to-snatch-children-for-adoption It came out just after my daughter was abducted, and the illegality has been unresolved for 15 years, which has egregiously stunk politics for 15 years. A wrong has not been put right. When are their criminal gangs going to apologise and put this right?
It should be pointed out by 2016 that everyone was made aware
"Every month a foster family or adoption family is paid a minimum of 500 pounds before expenses. Recent reports stated that the Department of Education wanted the voluntary adoption agencies to double the number of adoptions they had from 2,000 to 8,000 a year. This agency searches out parents who want a child. The local authority then goes and finds one. Just like a dating agency. The local authority pays the adoption agency 27,000 pounds for each new child it places with five children; that payment is 80,000 pounds. Of course, for this system to be working, the local authority needs this agency to keep finding placements and children taken into care. It was even suggested that the European model would replace the American/English model, which rejects forced adoption, which gives more rights to these families that don’t want to give up rights to their children.”
(Whoah) So there is the secret... An odious report put together by the coalition government invited investors to pour their money into a new social adoption fund called a ‘finance bond’ under the title ‘It's all about Me’. Under this scheme, the adoption agencies get far more than the 27,000 pounds fee for matching a parent to a child in care. This new all-inclusive service to stop the placement breaking down is 54,000 pounds per child paid in four instalments. A boost to finance the Social Outcomes Fund. A 20 million pound money pot. Of course, the investors would require a decent return on their capital. A Freedom of Information Request from a council in the South East had dealt with a staggering 179 cases over three years and received over 6 million pounds from fees from one council. This former company was owned by two social workers. A statement from the blurb Admits there are many agencies like their own which are now owned by private equity companies and have been sold on at a profit.”
Following the non-investigation of the LGSO in the case of East Sussex Our ref: 24 012 899 which Justine Mensa-Bonsu Assessment Manager of the LGSO said Mr Price had dealt with, which he meant in our language to mean ignored. Its stated in this letter dated today: reasons not to pursue investigation to save using scarce public resources.
Exciting News Some of my YouTube films, including the one above, have been entered to the AIIFF Film Awards 2025.
I requested information regarding a paternity test previously arranged through your office. Specifically, I ask for the percentages of countries of origin for:
Emily Cathryn Newbold Smith (DOB: 30/10/████, NHS Number: ███ ███ ████)
Lauren Juliet Peters (DOB: 30/04/████, NHS Number: ███ ███ ████)
Their mother, Catherine Louise Smith (DOB: 30/05/████, NHS Number: ███ ███ ████ – DECEASED)
David Cunningham believed to be the father of Lauren.
Every contribution, no matter the size, helps me reach my goal and make a meaningful difference. Your support is truly appreciated.
